Find a Lawyer

QAYYUM NAWAZ versus N.-W.F.P. SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT BOARD, PESHAWAR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Service Term Contracting This period in regular service to ascertain the truth through the Labor Appellate Tribunal Intervention through its High Court Constitutional scope in scope. Employees were hired on contract basis and were discharged from the job following holiday extension and payment of leave, however, their services were available immediately after termination of employment. They were assigned what they deserved. It was recognized as a regular employee even during the term of the contract, rejected by the Labor Court, but on appeal, the Labor Appellate Tribunal found that employees were regular employees under the constitutional jurisdiction of the Constitutional High Court, however, the Labor Appellate Tribunal Let's put the verification decision aside. After the Labor Appellate Tribunal considered the entire evidence, the parties' inception determined the factual question that the employees were permanent laborers in performing the duties of the Establishment, and that the contract should be settled between the employees and the employer. Was done to deprive of legal rights. The Labor Appellate Tribunal rightly considered that the agreement had been finalized. In view of the mandatory provisions of section 4 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 in relation to re-employment, the Labor Appellate Tribunal's fact, based on the proper assessment of the evidence on record. Had to find out. Not an open challenge by the High Court, especially for exercising your constitutional jurisdiction. female advocates from Sihala lawyer