Article 156 (1) (89) / 157/178 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Ordinance of Drugs (XIII of 1996), Section 8 / 9C General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Section 13 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 403 and 561 were already sentenced under the Customs Act 1969 after a trial by a special judge (Customs) and he was sentenced under which he Had charged. , Special Judge, was also called for trial for offenses punishable under Sections 8 and 9C of the Anti-Drug Control Ordinance 1996 by the Counter Narcotics, he has, no doubt, committed two of the Customs Act 1969 The laws were violated and the Control of Narcotic Substance Ordinance, 1996, but his crime was the same for which he could not be tried twice. The second case was forbidden under Article 13 of the Constitution, Article 26 of the General Clause Act and Section 403 of the Criminal Code. o The central test in such cases was whether allegations from the same evidence could be retained under both evidence and the same evidence should be headed in the trial against the accused in both forums and both alleged crimes. The ingredients were the same as after the trial. Under the Customs Act, 1969, the accused could not be prosecuted under the anti-drug laws; the second case before the Special Judge (Anti-Narcotics) was not only for the sake of constitutional protection, but also forbidden under other laws. Was, as stated above and thus, a fool in the eyes of the law and was crushed accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
