Find a Lawyer

DR. MUHAMMAD ARSLAN versus CHANCELLOR, QUAID-E-AZAM UNIVERSITY

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 2A & 4 Quaid-e-Azam University Act (XXVIII of 1973) Section 12 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Termination of Service Applicant, Chairman of any department appointed at the University 12 (1), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by the Leader, as Chancellor of the University, after assuming the office of President, for a legal term of 4 years as Vice-Chancellor of the University. The order of appointment of the E-Azam University Act, 1973 states that the applicant should complete his term before the expiry date of the four-year term, but the University Chancellor has appointed it under the appointment of another person. Issued an order under section 12 (1) of the Act. The University Vice-Chancellor replaced the applicant, with immediate effect for a four-year term, whose services were ordered to terminate, even though the applicant's legal term is still expired. Filed a constitutional petition before the High Court which was rejected by the High Court for lack of jurisdiction stating that there was a forum service tribunal authorized to seek treatment, after which the applicant! Appeal was filed before the service tribunal, which was dismissed as time-barred. At the hearing of the petitioner's legitimate demands, it was stated that the applicant had completed four years of service, however, the applicant's fair term was employment. To expire later, therefore, the Chancellor unlawfully issued an order under Section 12 (1) of the Act in which another person was appointed Vice-Chancellor in place of the applicant, jobs for fresh advocates from Gakhar Mandi lawyer