Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

REHMAT KHAN versus D.G., INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS AND EXCISE)


Control of the Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Section 403 of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 2 (s), 16, 178 and 156 (1) (8) (82) (89) of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) , Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 13 and 199 The theory of constitutional application of double jeopardy = The theory was exported to applicants at the departure hall of the International Airport under which the Special Judge (Customs) And taxation). Section 2 (s), 16, 178, 156 (1) (8) (82) (89), to the Customs Act and to the Special Judge under section 265 under Section 2 (c) of the Narcotic Material Control Act 1997 Before dismissing the Special Judge's application, the PC filed by the applicant was ruled by the Department that the applicants in the Special Judge's Court, without being guilty or acquitted by the court of competent jurisdiction. Was subjected to a double jeopardy trial. Taxation) will either result in the offender having been tuned or acquitted on the basis of facts, evidence and alleged recovery in this case while the presence of the same facts and evidence by the Special Judge in the same set of Anti-Drug Substances Act Under Section 9 (c) of 1997, there will be another trial. Clearly, this results in a duplicate trial or at least a fraudulent trial for violation of dual-risk beliefs. The affected person may, under section & and under a court of competent jurisdiction, demand the termination of such proceedings without being previously guilty or acquitted for the same offense. 9 (c) of the Narcotic Materials Stances Act, 1997, which is pending before the Special Judge. Accordingly the application was allowed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.