Find a Lawyer

SGS PAKISTAN (PRIVATE) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD NOORULLAH KAZI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Request for a Complaint The complaint for rehabilitation was filed by the employees against two companies; the employees of a Pakistani company and another foreign company were, in fact, employed by a foreign company and It was not one of the two companies, both Pakistani and foreign. The same Establishment found by Labor Court employees was assigned to and for a foreign company, and letters of confirmation of employee services were also issued by the foreign company and the full and indemnity of the employees' liabilities. In the final settlement, the suspension letters were also issued by a foreign company check. It was also issued by a foreign company that the Pakistani company was a joint stock company registered under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, while the foreign company was established as an agency only after the government obtained a contract with Pakistan. , The two companies were engaged in two different directions in their business activities and affairs. Just because the offices of the two companies would be located in the same building, they would not build them because an establishment was closed by a foreign company and its contract with the government of Pakistan was terminated. Pakistanis could not claim their status as employees of the company. Complaints filed by employees against a Pakistani company were not worth hearing, according to law by a foreign company. best law firms from Miran Shah lawyer