Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZIM BROHI versus MUHAMMAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 497 (5) and 265 J Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, cancellation of one of the pre-arrest suspects, before the police Was not present and it was all absconding. After completing the investigation, the police presented the challan which stated that the accused was shown as absconding, the absconding accused was absconding with law. The next day after his arrest, the other suspect was put in the identity parade, where he was identified. One person died on the spot through all witnesses, including the injured, while the other persons sustained serious arm injuries. The statement of the prosecution witnesses under Section 156464, CRPC, revealed that the accused had contacted some of the defendants' witnesses. Such statements are recorded wherein the accused confessed to his crime and the accused offered to pay the complainant party, in the presence of the accused, the accused under section 6565 JJ, CCPC Can be used as crucial evidence for a bail approval, which is appropriate with the trial court, was this identification parade held a month and nineteen days after the incident? Legal status cannot be identified at the trial court's favor at the bail stage, as it is the final decision of the case otherwise the trial court did not even consider the identity of the accused the next day after the arrest of the ocular evidence. The parade was held. The accused was the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses had no enmity with the accused. online advocate from Rajanpur lawyer