REGARDING PUTTING OF TWO GOVERNMENT OFFICERS NAMELY HASAN WASEEM AFZAL AND HIS WIFE FARKHANDA WASEEM versus
Article 184 (3) constitutional application under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, posting of public servants, with the remaining records, as special duty (OSD) officers, without any explanation, the victim of a political court In violation of the directives issued by the Supreme Court in the case of Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi and others v. Federation of Pakistan and others (PLD 2013 SC 195), two senior civil servants, who were officers in BS21, were arrested in the year 2008. Was made an officer on Special Duty (OSD) and was given no postings in 2011 and was told that two public servants were being paid. Qi was sent for but he was deferred on the sole basis that he could not receive any Performance Aviation Reports (PER) as he was posted on Special Duty (OSD). , Which was not their own course of action The civil servants in question could not obtain one or the other performance test reports (PERs) because their posting was O. Firearms on Special Duty (OSD), but this could not be ascertained their loss under any box of law and no reason was given by the concerned department and the personnel for such treatment record. Has not shown anything that can demand such treatment. If the past performance or integrity of public servants was below the mark of the question, they could have been treated like this but there was nothing like that they would have suffered / may not have been approved. There was an order to provide justice, which was denied to government employees by anger and outrage.
