KARAMAT ALI versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Guarantee, was not initially named for the accused named in the FIR, but in the FIR Another accused was named, the accused was accused of receiving on his lips during the incident, but could not be brought on record to indicate his participation in the incident, but instead According to the character, none other than Lalkar was convicted. In the circumstances, further investigation was required against the accused and accordingly he was allowed to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kashmir lawyer
