RAUF YOUSAF versus BAHADAR ALI, MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, LAHORE BENCH
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 Dien Pakistan (1973), Retaining Art 199 Constitutional Appeal Before taking advantage of the appeal of the appeal by the National Industrial Relations Commission, before taking effect on non-available alternative treatment, Provided under Section 22A, the petitioner's view in 1969 was that since the Full Bench Oil National Industrial Relations Commission had expressed some opinion in another matter, the applicant had deliberately placed the order directly in the constitutional petition. The challenge was to say that instead of the tired treatment of appeals it was chosen The Full Bench National Industrial Relations Commission had decided and expressed some other cases on this matter, it would not mean that the applicant filed a constitutional petition directly, instead of taking advantage of the jurisdiction of the appellant. Will be able to Given the legal and factual dispute, they issue a renewal if the applicant feels that his or her case is prominent or that the preceding theory is not correct, then, in accordance with constitutional law, they are subject to national industrial relations. Can deal with his argument to favor the Commission for a different view. Petitions cannot be entertained in the presence of alternative appeal remedies
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Amangarh lawyer