Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus NASIBULLAH


Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Suit Review Below the dispute over the ownership of the property, the two courts find the facts on the record after the fact has been discovered by the fact. The consolidated results reached. The plaintiff's case was dismissed. The final jurisdiction of the following facts by the courts cannot be interfered with in the amending jurisdiction because the matter cannot be considered if the facts are unlawfully revised wherever such Nothing illegal exists. It has been pointed out, and neither, that the access to the following courts was against the evidence of the record, that the decisions and decrees of the two courts were not interfered with.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Sanghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.