Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional application was filed by the defendant in the case for restoration of interim period and restoration of marital rights while the latter application was filed. The judges had filed the following two cases, the trial court dismissed the defendant's case and pronounced the petitioner's decision, while the lower appellate court reversed the trial court's decision on which the appellant. Court expressed. In the event of a collision of judgment unless it is against the evidence on record or violates the principles of justice administration, the fact entered by the Lower Appellate Court is misleading, arbitrary or arbitrary. The preferred view was not taken. Evidence was supported by the lower appellate court, while the trial court neither spoke on the evidence nor complied with the provisions of OAXS, R5, CPC where it was supported by the lower appellate court. The conclusions were not lawful, which was not interfered with by the High Court in implementation: arbitrary jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
