Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus LIAQAT ALI

Sections 5 and 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Conduct Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974, XLV of 1860 (Section XLV of 1860) were barred from appeal on 307 when the trial court acquitted the accused at the time of the verdict and Did not surrender. Before the court's order and it had no right of audience, otherwise, the accused was immediately designated with an unclear role in the FIR, including the complainant's eye witnesses from the accused party. There was no enmity and his presence was confessed on the spot. Defensively the Ocular Account was confirmed by medical evidence along with the version presented in the FIR, shortly after the incident. Had also supported the prosecution's story, the trial court had inadvertently given up, so that the commission's sentence could be recorded. 30 307 under Section 157 of the Crimes, Punishment Code and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Sentencing Law Enforcement Act, 1974, in which Shariah court was able to award award by deciding the reference for verification of the death sentence under Section 374 C. Before the disappearance of CP Element, the accused did not deserve the death sentence and was sentenced to life imprisonment, the accused was also sentenced to less than 5 years RI. 307 of the Code of Conduct and Section 15 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitution Law Enforcement Act 1974 property advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer