MUHAMMAD AHMED versus GHULAM NABT
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional plea seeking the witness for the first time a police officer was the testimony of a witness, but after that, he was accused in the case. Presented as: Said police officer, during the investigation, he was found not guilty and was released and was placed in column no.2 of 173 report under CRPC, the prosecution police officer has stated in the FIR significantly. Didn't know about. The facts of the case may be helpful in deciding the facts of the case, and the evidence, therefore, appears to be necessary only for the decision of the case; the trial court, in those circumstances, was appropriate and the said police officer. Had to be checked. It may be unjust to testify and prevent it in the trial. The impugned order passed by the trial court through the trial did not demand a legal, fair and proper interference trial. rt, however, while examining the evidence of the police officer, it was instructed to keep in mind that he was an accused and the constitutional request was dealt with accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Lasbela lawyer