Find a Lawyer

NASIR JAMAL versus PAK SUZUKI MOTOR COMPANY LIMITED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (viii), (xxviii), 25 A & 37 (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section 2 (f) (iv) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) ), Art 199 Constitutional Applicants Applicants Determining Employment Applicants Applying Determinants filed a complaint against the Company's order requiring them to make verbal complaint requests for their services by the Labor Court. Was granted, but the Labor Appellate Tribunal set aside the appeal order. The Labor Court held that the applicants were not employees of the company but they were employees of the contractor and had no contractor of any kind with the company and there was no cause for complaint by the applicants against the contractor, if there was any evidence. So, he had proved that the company had no business. There was no administrative control over the applicants nor any authority for the restoration or removal of the applicants, nor was the company liable for Petty's wages. The tuners, neither said the contractor was fraudulent, checked on the evidence available on record. The Labor Appellate Tribunal could not be bothered by the High Court in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction because a different view was possible. criminal advocate from Tank lawyer