DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER (M) ELEMENTARY BAHAWALNAGAR versus MUHAMMAD ALAM
Constitution of Pakistan Civil servant 197 Civil Government employee was eligible for written examination and interview taken by the Government-appointed recruitment committee prior to his appointment and he was given the responsibility but about seven seven of his appointments. Weeks later, he was verbally informed that his appointment was not made in accordance with the rules, as he could not be allowed to work as instructed by the competent authority? Is it legal? The public servant was neither affiliated with any inquiry nor was the party to the Constitutional petition in the High Court directed to examine the appointments by a particular department of the department, nor was it forged or forged on its certificates. Has been accused of being. ??? There was nothing available on the record that could justify a sanction ban against a public servant? Such an oral order is not an order in the eyes of the law; the service tribunal's decision implies that the public servant should be considered to have served from the date of his appointment and he was entitled to all return privileges. Was fair and reasonable? .... There is no question about the law governing the interference of public importance by the Supreme Court which has supported the request for leave of appeal. Contrary to the decision of the service tribunal, the applications were dismissed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
