Find a Lawyer

ASHFAQ AHMAD versus UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE

Section 2 (W) (Z), 15 (3), 21, 24 and 25 of the University of Agriculture Faisalabad Act 1973, Faisalabad (University Teachers) Election Law, 1973, Constitution No. 23 (2) Constitution of Pakistan ( 1973), Article 199 constitutional applicant shall be registered as a voter in the selection of the University Syndicate and the electoral respondent, who was appointed ad hoc lecturer at the University, who was elected a member syndicate, Was a permanent lecturer at the university. Defendant's choice challenged that the university's ad hoc employee had no right to register as a voter and was not eligible to contest in favor of the university's syndicate = selection, although the university's faculty appointment powers I was an executive body. Of the University, but the Vice-Chancellor said that the University could create temporary positions in the exercise of its emergency powers and for a period of more than six months. Respondent's note that the ad hoc employee could also contest the syndicate election was accepted, which would result in extraordinary results because although the ad hoc employee's appointment period cannot be more than six months, he is a member of the syndicate. Will go and hold it. For two years, the office has not even allowed ad hoc employees to participate in elections in any way, neither in the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad Act 1973 nor in the University of Agriculture, Faisalabad (University Teachers) Election Law, 1973. The High Court's jurisdiction over the use of tin testicle has led to the choice of syndicate respondents. us immigration advocates from Wah Cantt lawyer