Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD versus REMIFAR (PAKISTAN) LTD

Civil Procedure Code Order XSXII Section 6 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 48 and A. XXXIV, R4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 181, on the mortgage of the real estate One of the lawsuits filed by the bank implementing the order for collection of 183 suit loans was filed by the special court (banking) and more than five years after the approval of the final order before the court's order. An application for implementation of this order was filed. For the purpose of applying for execution, only the maximum of the High Court can be enforced by Article 181, Limitation Act, 1908, which was banned for a period of three years, after more than five years. The request for execution of the decree was rightly dismissed; the restriction was imposed. In the second case, though the High Court approved, it said that the order was not approved by the High Court in the use of the Civil Rights Court jurisdiction, but after its approval. The district court's case was because the cost of the trial was beyond the jurisdiction of the district court's execution request filed more than five years after the date of the final order's approval. It is also bound to be rejected over time because the imposition of the ban on Article 181, Limitation Act 1908, instead of Article 183 of the Constitution Act, provides for a six-year statutory decree, as well as its original application by the High Court. Was used in the civil war. Article 183 of the Jurisdiction Act, 1908, passed by the High Court in exercise of its ordinary citizenship jurisdiction registration advocate from Sakrand lawyer