Find a Lawyer

SALEEM AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus C.B.R

Central Excise and Salt Act 1944 Section 35B Section RO No. 546 (1) (I), Letter No. L (10) / CEB / 95 of 969 1994, dated 9th 1998 1998 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appeal was pending before the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed interim relief. The Appellant challenged the appraisal order while retaining the constitutional petition while his first appeal was before the Collector Central Excise and the second appeal. Nothing was brought in pending pending relief. At home or even it has been alleged that the constitutional petition could be justified when the applicant was violating his intention in front of a competent forum that could decide the issues involved in the constitutional petition, In this way, any relief or disapproval of the constitutional petition will provide disappointment. Appeals from the Customs Tribunal and the High Court under Section 36C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Conducting a constitutional petition, therefore, jumping the two forums provided under the law and order in the constitutional petition would result in the proceedings before the Customs Tribunal rendering it baseless and its appeal to any party to the issue. There will be no chance of being taken to court. Whether the jurisdiction to enforce the jurisdiction or to disappoint the High Court's appeal jurisdiction over the fact would have been a completely unconstitutional application, in the circumstances, was not enforceable. solicitors from Chishtian lawyer