PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYEES\' UNION versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, REGION, HYDERABAD HYDERABAD
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 17 and 199 Constitutional plea collective bargaining agent, commitment to conduct referendum intervention by district magistrate was postponed due to political and law. And the law and order situation was not conducive to such referendum for public peace. The Deloitte District Magistrate / Deputy Commissioner was not able to interfere with trade union affairs by raising an unreasonable request for law and order. Such officials should keep in mind that they are interfering with fundamental rights. Prior to the approval of an order, there was no material available from the trade union that authorized the district magistrate to interfere with the holding of a referendum for the appointment of a collective bargaining agent and it is unclear. Whether the district magistrate's order was approved under section 144. The CCP has no provision of law, nor was any term ordered in the same order. Such an order was to deprive workers of their basic rights as guaranteed under Article 17 of the Constitution. Has been accepted under the Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
