Find a Lawyer

AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR versus DR. MUHAMMAD SARWAR CHAUDHARY, FORMER SECRETARY EDUCATION

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Act 1997 Section 2 (c) (i) (ii) [as amended by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability (Amendment) Act (VII of 1998)] Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974) VIII), protection of litigation during the tenure of the Chief Minister and other senior officials in Article 42 and Prime 44 Article 26) (ii) Prime Minister, Ministers under the provisions of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Act 1997 And the advisers were exempted from prosecution when they held their respective positions, they were declared by the High Court in violation of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, before the High Court before the Supreme Court. Detection was asked which was the object of the appeal cases must run smoothly to the state. Such office holders should be protected from illegal litigation during the period when they were occupying their respective offices, strengthening the purpose of justifying the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Act, 97 97 Collaborate with certain types of officers, especially among office-holders and office-bearers of corruption due to misconduct by certain office holders to facilitate the smooth process of state affairs. Will be affected. , The High Court did not have effective results, which the section 2 (c) ((i) (ii), which declared the violation of the Constitution of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Accountability Act 1997), was upheld by the Supreme Court. patent advocate from Mir Ali lawyer