I.T.A. NO.6658/KB OF 1991-9Z, DECIDED ON 19TH APRIL, 1999. versus I.T.A. NO.6658/KB OF 1991-9Z, DECIDED ON 19TH APRIL, 1999.
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 62, 16 and 24 (g) The Assessment of Production of Accounts, Evidence, etc. The Gravity Adjustment Assessing Officer did not allow the expense of the grant on the basis that not all material evidence was presented and to name a few. There were also discrepancies in the amount provided against. The amount paid was higher than the actual amount, so the assesseeing officer was not justified in denying the entire amount on the basis of only a few instances in which the payment was actually made, though less. In sum, Assisi provided full details of the persons and the amount owed. And pay and other evidence. Etc. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal obtained a remand to the Determination Officer, who could be directed to examine the facts of the payment details, etc. and, if he could not prove them in fact, the amount available was allowable. Business expenses should be allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
