ANAND LIQUORS versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Demand for Income from Fines Covering Section 1 to Section 271 (1) (c), filing an expedition to the SC, no voucher claiming salary, commission and transportation costs does not support the claim in the names of the partners. Cash credit in books is not properly maintained. The objections raised on the draft of the assessment were not explained, but the Assistant Commissioner of Investigation, the inspector's letter approving the assessment with a proposed increase of 48 million, says that the facts cannot be imposed. Clarification to Taxes Act, 1961, Section 271 (1) (c) Explanation 1
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer
