Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus SMT. P. K. NOORJAHAN


The words and phrases have been used in the same section of the bill introduced in Parliament, while inserting section 69 in the Income Tax Act, 1961, but the words mentioned in the Select Committee on consideration and recommendation of this bill. Can be substituted with the word which clearly shows that the intention of enacting Section 69 of Parliament was to give the Income Tax Officer discretion in dealing with the source of investment which is not a satisfactory explanation. Has been done The Assessee's Income and Income Tax Officer is not obliged to treat such investment as income by Assessment where the explanation offered by Assisi is not satisfactory, the question is whether the source of the investment In the light of the facts of each case, whether or not it should be treated as income under section 69

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Haroonabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.