Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

UCO BANK versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX


The method of calculating the increase in income was not taken into account for profit and loss on the banks financial institutions sticky advances, but rather the income treatment according to Section 45 Section Section of the concept of income treatment in separate suspense account accounting practice. To determine. CBDT has allowed such interest to be exempt from income for up to three years so after that, interest will be included as income only when in fact the Indian Indian Income Tax Act, 61 119: And received 555 [Kerala Financial Corporation v CIT (1994) 210 ITR 179 (SC) rejected; CIT v UCO Bank i93) 201 ITR 162; CIT v Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation i) No. 1) (1996) 218 ITR 616 and CIT v. Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (No. 2) (1996) 218 1TR 620 Reversed

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Morgah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.