Find a Lawyer

FATEH MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD

Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Sections 356 (3), 439 and 537 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), failure of the Presiding Officer to produce 5 302/324 witnesses' memorandum, the affected applicant / accused It was alleged that through the complainant, the presiding officer, instead of recording the complainant's initial evidence in his own hand, left it to his reader, who assumed the role of the presiding officer and recorded the witnesses' statements. , It was further alleged that no certificate was appended by the trial court. The court claimed to have prepared the memorandums of the applicants / accused positions that the proceedings against them are totally unconstitutional in the view of the trial court's order as they were summoned to face trial. And there was nothing illegal in the record that showed it. This was preliminary evidence: The reader was led by a trial court, as alleged by the applicant / defendant, and instead every statement was signed before the court's failure. The section officer considered under section 356 (3) was the CRPC for the preparation of witnesses' memorandum, however, under section 537 was an irrevocable remedy, the applicant / accused of the PCP being his Failure to present positive evidence of the claim that preliminary evidence was recorded. The petitioner / accused's objection was rejected by the court reader and it was asked to identify any bias against them through irregularities. list of advocates from Khanqah Dogran lawyer