ATTA MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/325/34/148 & 149 The value of the evidence was not affected by the credibility that the co-accused, who was the father of the accused, in his statement under section 342, CR PC It is said that it was the co-accused who committed the murder of the deceased, that he would not exclude the accused from the commission of murder, which was the evidence of the prosecution, that as the father of the accused, he had killed his sons. A confessional statement was made to save him, but his mere confession / confession was not enough to prove a crime, and he did not have to be involved in other hate crime statements. Prosecutors' testimony proved that the accused was responsible for causing the death of the deceased, he was truly convicted and sentenced by the co-accused / defendant's father, who made the allegation. He was able to pull balls from the eyes of the prosecution witnesses and persuade the other accused to kill his son, who had confessed to his crime, and was also sentenced. Accordingly, prosecution was also made. Failure to link the other accused to the Commission of Crime, they were acquitted of the charges and ordered to be released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Shahdad Pur lawyer