Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus AMAR NATH


Germany is estimated to be hiding business in the assessment year from nineteen 19 69 to prior to the on68 assessment year and it is claimed that the individual business L firm changed from 67 firm to from partnership firm Although the partnership process was implemented on 26 26 1967, the IAC holds this income from individual businesses. Income for the whole year is not disclosed by the Assisi for the period from 1 4 1967 to 26 8 1967, indicating that in the case of the Assisi in the individual status from 26 to 1967, the entire year's income is fully contributed. Income Tax Act, 1961, Section 271 (1) (c) is not valid, no penalty can be disclosed under Income Tax Act 1915.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.