I.T.AS. NOS.445/KB TO 449/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 19TH MAY, 1999 versus I.T.AS. NOS.445/KB TO 449/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 19TH MAY, 1999
Section 22 & and ded tax The requirement of the person responsible for the reduction of tax or failure to pay was that the orders were demanded under the Income Tax Ordinance, 52 1979 of 5 52/8686 and, hence, the order of review. 22 / There were no Income Tax Ordinances, 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, to increase the demand under \ 9, although such orders are the result of an increase in the demand for tax. Validate actual or imaginable earnings of tax demand. When they were default, this additional tax was calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, with respect to the legal obligation to withhold payment tax from the payment of the payers, and the taxpayer's own Was not temporarily liable for tax liabilities. Only for the crime of witnessing or fulfilling their legal obligations
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
