Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD & CO. versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Claims to pay for the work done by the applicant for the respondents Constitution Petition Competition Petitioner, who worked for the respondent authority, directed the respondent authority in its constitutional application. Was supposed to pay the outstanding balance for a long time. Although the respondent authority issued checks for payment of money to the applicant, but said that the checks were not cleared due to shortage of funds, the respondent authority acknowledged the applicant's claim but did not pay the funds. And has failed to pay for non-funding of funds. The respondent authority, there was no legal justification. If the respondent authority did not have the funds, he should not have worked with the applicant. The respondent authority had raised an initial objection to the effect that the constitutional petition filed by the applicant was ineligible. Because it has a civil suit treatment. Not valid civil suit, the appropriate remedy in the AR was to repay the disputed amount, but the disputed amount was accepted not only by the defendants, Gut said that the applicant through check due to non-receipt of funds The amount was also paid, objecting to the disqualification of the constitutional petition, was very ideological and the High Court accepted the constitutional petition filed by the petitioner and directed the respondent authority to pay the amount within the stipulated period of the applicant. Clean up criminal advocate from Kala Bagh lawyer