Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BUX CHANDIO versus SATTAR

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 Sindh Building Control Ordinance (V 1979), Section 20A suit declaration and injunction before the legality period expires Was retained on the defendant authority = such notice when the notice was issued stating that the building was dangerous due to the rejection of the defendant's defense authority, the owner / applicant of the building needed to destroy those copies. Notices were also sent to the plaintiffs / defendants who were the plaintiffs in the building / defendants filed Section 20A, Sindh Building Control Ordinance. Submitted notice under C, 1979, when defendants requested building authority inspection, they did not provide relief to the plaintiffs / defendants, who filed a declaration that the building was demolished by the authority. The notice issued from it was illegal and the said authority was barred from processing the said notice by the plaintiffs suit was filed by the plaintiffs, under section 20A of the Sindh Building Control Ordinance 1979, from the service of the notice to the nine. Days later, after a period of sixty days following the delivery of a notice notice under Section 20A of the Sindh Suite Building Control Ordinance. Was to be filed, 1979 was required when the Act was done or intended under the ordinance and if not the authority did something which was not lawful, then the terms under the ordinance did not come into force. And will not be prosecuted. Was simply thrown out because the said ordinance was not given notice under section 20A and the sixty-day period did not expire lawer from fb area from Shikarpur lawyer