Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus KHEMCHAND MOTILAL JAIN


References Business Expenses Capital or Revenue Expenses The amount paid for trademarks and goodwill, whether the expenditure is a question of law, was held by the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961, Sections 37 and 256, the question of whether, the facts and In the circumstances of the matter, the tribunal was right in saying that the company paid 22,91,728 and 22,66, the amount paid by the company to the co-owners and former firm's partners in exchange for trade marks and goodwill. The cost of taxation for a business that was using Rs 746 was a question of law which had to be sent to the High Court. A.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.