Find a Lawyer

SARDAR KHAN versus STATE

Controlling Section 9 (c) / 15 Criminal Code (v. 1898) of the Narcotic Sub-Metals Act 1997, 5 439 The reviewing accused sought to suspend the unclean order of the special court under which the application of Section 265, C.R.P. Was transferred by them under C. Were excluded, the correctness and legality of this order was to be seen in the petition for review, the High Court could not be satisfied that after the challan before the trial court, the above order was invalid, illegal or illegal. Was such a decision that the trial court, in its arbitrary argument, had the full right to decide the application under Section 265 of the CCPC, a piece of evidence submitted by the accused to the inquiry report. As the investigating officer had gathered in favor of the prosecution and that both would be used to collect the evidence. Appropriate whipping is required during the trial so as to determine the truth and falsehood for whom. h The two sides were required to present their evidence only for the conclusion of the matter, by no means could it be said to be false. Particularly when these two key recovery witnesses were not examined by the Inquiry Officer, a judicial inquiry could not be given as much importance as the accused presented otherwise, no purpose of investigation and trial was to be determined. The request for was thrown out of circumstances. best advocate from Raiwind lawyer