Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX versus MAHENDRA SINGH


The reference question decided by the High Court cannot be referred to the High Court's interest decision in the same case that interest cannot be obtained under Sections 139 (8) and 217 even though interest may be charged in such manner. , The Indian Income Tax Act 1961, Sections 139, 217 and 256 of the Reference Appellate Tribunal jurisdiction has been amended by the Single Member Bench Act S, 255 (3) when in the case of Rs. Expansion is one lakh rupees, Single Member Jurisdiction Question Bench which in this case restores more than one lakh rupees In 1981, the proceedings began in the 1980s 81 81 October 1984 81 for, the law questions the Indian Income Tax Act, 616161, sections 555 and 256.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Chaghi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.