Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.565/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 11TH MARCH, 1999. versus I.T.A. NO.565/KB OF 1998-99, DECIDED ON 11TH MARCH, 1999.

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 13 (1) (b) and 65 Additional Self Assessment Schemes No Account Case No Special Audit Assessment Case was selected for Special Audit for the assessment year in 1997, citing 98 conciliations. In the review year there was accretion in wealth which explained the investment made in the purchase of property in 1984 85 and 209 1997. The siting officer found that the figures were announced in previous years ie 1981 to 1982. Assessment up to 85 was less than the income earned in the year 1984 and was increased to Section 13 (1) (b), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. Services section of the balance amount of appeal was diagnosed in 1997 was 98 years, 98 can not work during the 13 (1) (1997 98 under B) and to act on it. To be considered under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was assessed for the year 1984 85 which was prohibited from accepting the inclusion of such dispute as the Ian on 30 30, 1997 as per the assessment year. Did not have to take notice during or during 1997 98 that property not purchased during 1984 85 85 209 1997, however, the assessment was not related to the year 1997 98, therefore, there was section 13 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 (B) No justification for seeking, which was truly, excluded, though on a different basis ask a advocate free from Village Sunder lawyer