I.T.A. NO.1979/KB OF 1997-98, DECIDED ON 13TH MARCH, 1999. versus I.T.A. NO.1979/KB OF 1997-98, DECIDED ON 13TH MARCH, 1999.
Section 66A & 59 (1) The deputy commissioner's inspection options for review of the order of the deputy commissioner were approved on the basis of showcase notices by the additional commissioner presenting the documents to the examiner and inspecting them. There was a need to define the investment. Accepted by the Assessing Officer when completing the assessment under section 59 (1) of the Income Tax Ordinance, the 1979 accuracy order approved by the Assessing Officer was not considered false and biased by the IAC for the interest of the tax but The notice suggested the collection of materials as investigated and upon reaching the conclusion of prejudice to the tax, it is stated that the Investigation Investigation Officer of the Inquiry had accepted the order, and thereafter, to conduct the inspection. The Additional Commissioner had tried to base the search by the Orsing Officer without any material evidence. Illegal and the tribunal canceled
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
