Articles 4 and 5 of the contempt of court Act 1976, before the contempt of court, have been stated that on the first occasion he had made an unconditional apology and put himself at the mercy of the High Court. That the statement of the High Court has been affirmed by the order of the accused / appellant in the written statement before the Supreme Court. He will be even more cautious in the future and repeat the unconditional waiver. The unconditional waiver submitted by the appellant was accepted by the Supreme Court and the order of punishment was set aside by the High Court and the notice issued to the appellant. Was dismissed and the appellant was warned to be cautious in the future.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
