ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 (b) 34 Testimony of Evidence The eye witnesses were not only closely linked to the witnesses of the occasion and also of the witnesses, they were outraged and interested in the accused and the case related to the seizure of the alleged injuries. The hearing was improved. The purpose of the FIR was not confirmed as the accused was found dead, witnesses were also not mentioned in the inspection note prepared by the inquiry officer on his first visit. ? The defendant was available for ocular evidence established by the prosecution, after a gun and a pistol were recovered from the suspect, the forensic science laboratory was sent against the accused, the possibility of the crime being vacated by the police. Could not be denied. Recovery of the crime weapon was a violation of the medical evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Bannu lawyer