Find a Lawyer

ZAHIDA PARVEEN versus SHAUKAT ARA

Code of Conduct 1908 Sections 12 (2) and 115 affirmed the decision challenging the decree and the decree on the application of fraud and misrepresentation was compromised on the agreement between the parties. It was held that the application for a stay of the judgment was filed more than four years after the decree of settlement, under section 12 (2), the CPC which was rejected for prosecution by the prosecution. , The application for reinstatement of the application was filed which excluded the default applicant, however, for withdrawal The petition was filed under section 12 (2), CPC that the plaintiff filed a petition because of misunderstanding and misconduct and since the parties have compromised the case, the applicant Didn't want to take further action in this matter. Refusal to withdraw as requested under Section 12 (2), respondents of the CPC and the restoration request resisted that the withdrawal of the said request would adversely affect the rights of the respondents. ? Those who were involved in a compromise between the peace-responding parties, if they have a complaint, can file their petition and seek asylum. The petitioner's request for fraud and misrepresentation belonged to a person who accused the same applicant, who stated that there had been a compromise between the parties and that Article 12 (2), C.P. An application was made under C and the request for restoration of the application will be filed by a lawyer without his direction criminal advocate from Talhur lawyer