Find a Lawyer

ZAHEER AHMED QURESHI versus IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN SHAH

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Implementation of an agreement to sell the suit to the trial court after hearing the suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the property. Is related to Wendy Holds Wendy's decision to recover the seizure from the vendors / defendants and the trial court's decision by the trial court were appealed by the High Court in an appeal filed by the defendants / vendors vendors. Refuse to execute the contract, claiming to prove the issue as a matter of execution. The sale agreement was also erroneously made on the defendants / vendors and the same was to be placed on the plaintiff / seller and it was stated that the mistake was to prove that the defendants had seriously objected to the issue. And it is stated that the matter was not raised by the defendants / sellers. Before the court before the trial, at any time during or after the trial, it was unnecessary to attack the defendants / vendors to prove the case. Despite the fact that the defendant / seller was responsible for the matter, the plaintiff / shopkeeper was asked to present his evidence first, which provided evidence accordingly. Defendants / vendors also failed to show how their case was dealt with prejudice. Prove their case, the recent finding of fact recorded on the basis of the material recorded by the trial court and the High Court was not shown to be inaccurate reading or reading of such Supreme Court in the case of such fact finding. property advocate from Rajanpur lawyer