Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SARGODBA

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 133 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition In a dispute between the parties regarding the order of the deputy commissioner's passage in the pending case before the competent jurisdictional civil court. The plaintiff's case was filed. To which the trial court has prevented the defendant from obstructing the route. When the sui defendant had increased the construction on that route, contempt proceedings were initiated and the trial court ordered the plaintiff to stand trial. Construction orders must be separated at the bottom. In the appeal filed by the appellant, the appellant submitted the application under section 133, CCPC to the Deputy Commissioner, which ordered the deputy commissioner's construction order to be dismissed, which the appellate court amended. The jurisdiction was set under the legal dispute. The decision to restore the passage had already been decided by the Civil Court after the Court failed to appeal, moving a petition under Section 133 to the usual legal action with the purpose of defeating a court-approved order of a competent jurisdiction. Attempts to be ignored, the CRP order of the lower appellate court did not face any patent. Or late illegal or factual defects so that they can be excluded if the High Court's unusual jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution Petition is sought. jobs for advocates from Jaranwala lawyer