ABDUL REHMAN, COUNCILLOR versus CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB LOCAL COUNCILS ELECTION AUTHORITY, LAHORE
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 185 (3) and the 1994 Election Constitution Petitioners believed that they were deprived of their right to cast their votes during the prescribed time despite being in the office of Returning Officer, dismissing the High Court. Should have According to the constitutional petition filed by him, the question of whether his complaint was valid or whether the applicants were entitled to the right to vote, was in fact a question of the status of a High Court, though, with their constitutional jurisdiction. It was unreasonable to refuse to resolve this factual dispute. The observation that the proper way to resolve applicants' complaints is in filing an election petition, a reasonable order passed by the High Court, which does not suffer from any legal malpractice or instability, did not guarantee the intervention of the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Attock lawyer