MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MASSAN
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Sections 15 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Suit for pre-emption writ petition for pre-arrest by the Pre-Kings The termination order was issued because the previously vacant landlord / respondents did not contest the suit. After more than three years it has applied for cancellation. One year after the Ex-Parte Decree, he filed a complaint against the applicants / decree holders under Section 12 (2), G, PC, alleging that the former decree was misrepresented and ex-emperors through fraud. Was obtained by. Wendy's, who neither filed an application to revoke the former party decree nor filed an appeal to defy its legal status, not just the pre-emptive deposit money Was withdrawn in the RS / Plaintiff court, but they also seized the land of former emperors in the execution proceedings, a pre-trial case filed by pre-emptors against the vendors was pending in the trial court. The shopkeepers were sued against the former party and the case was subsequently pronounced. More than three years after the ex-Wendy was placed in his plea under Section 12 (2), the CPC did not say whether to prosecute him or not. Knew or bit them against them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Topi lawyer