NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR
The presence of the CPC and the non-submission of the petition in the absence of the plaintiff's rehabilitation case were postponed to the parties' statement of civil procedure code Order IX of O IX, Rr 8 and 9, on the date of the agreement between the parties. Have made an impact. Defendant and his lawyer were present on the deferred date for filing a written statement through the Defendant but the Plaintiff was absent and the case was dismissed on that date in order for the Parliament to influence the settlement. Delay was demanded and the postponed date was to be reported. As regards the court whether the parties have been compromised or the date of the adjournment, thus, the date of the trial could not be excluded by default, as there was no date for hearing the case, only one The suit could have been dismissed in the absence of the plaintiff in history. The suit, which had a hearing date, was ordered to be restored as a payment of costs
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Jaranwala lawyer