Find a Lawyer

MIR HAZAR KHAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC), Section 497 Sentencing Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, the defendant's grant, who lived with the deceased in his house, was present at the time of the commission of the complaint. Chesham was not a witness and the FIR was completely lodged by the victim's daughter-in-law on the facts which was a crime, so the accused had illicit relations with the victim's wife as other facts were not known as illicit. Relationships existed. At the time of filing of the FIR, the additional statement of the complainant by the police and the statements of the other prosecutor's witness were recorded when the complainant's knowledge came to light, with the witnesses of the prosecution, Was not charged, before which the accused committed an extra-judicial confession. The accused was seen coming out of the victim's house armed with a TT pistol whip. Based on the evidence of the circumstances, there was enough grounds to believe that the accused was guilty of the crime for which he was accused. Was imposed, denied bail. criminal advocate from Jampur lawyer