STATE versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 confession of evidence A prosecution witness who was the victim's brother said in his inspection that the accused was not involved in the murder of his brother but that he was falsely implicated by the evidence. The prosecution's case has turned into highly questionable testimony. Referring to the recovery memo as a minor testimony, it was stated in a very clear term that no recovery of blank or direct rounds was affected in the presence of anal that it did not mark identification and Neither a parcel was produced, no parcel in the series of articles was produced in the vacant stream nor a firearm specialist was sent to determine if the suspect was allegedly arrested at the time of arrest. The ammunition rifle was also fired, neither blood-stained ground nor the shirt of the victim was sent to the laboratory. Nor was the allegedly recovered rifle sent to the firearm specialist to determine if it was working or did not perform any internal post mortem inspection for non-delivery of medical equipment. During the interrogation, no evidence was collected during the inquest which shows that the accused and the deceased were last seen together and were on their way to their homes. The complainant's evidence was heard and there was no evidence. Was found. At the time of the prosecution, the value, in the circumstances, had failed to prove the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Takhtbai lawyer