Find a Lawyer

QURESHI SALT & SPICES INDUSTRIES, KHUSHAB versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, KARACHI

Banking Companies (Debt Recovery) Ordinance 1979 1979 A XXXVII, Rr 1, 2 and 3 Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans) Ordinance (XIX of 1979), Article 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Appeal of the Supreme Court Claimed damages for damages due to the alleged breach of contract by the defendant (bank) in not advancing the loan, which the appellant claims was required for XXXVII, RR 1 & 2, c. Retrieve the summary procedure provided under the PC for which the order was sought without lying, in connection with the claim filed by the banking company, the recovery of the debt of the banking companies (Ordinance, 1979). The jurisdiction as a special court under section 6 (1), read with section 151, R2, by filing a miscellaneous application under AXXIII, R2. In the event of a breach of a company or a loan, the lender against the banking company could not immediately approve a decree because the claim for damages could not be settled in the suit on the negotiating device. The Supreme Court, however, refrained from commenting on whether the plaintiffs / applicants claim for damages that could be said to have been born out of debt, the Supreme Court added, if it filed a special court The order of the acting High Court has been withheld. Appeals for leave of appeal have been appealed on the basis that injustice will be sustained as the amount of damages allegedly incurred due to the failure of the respondents to forward the appellant's creditors. Huge amounts without proving advocate from Tarmatan lawyer