Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RASUL versus ATTA MUHAMMAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 417 (2A) Contempt of the Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/319/364 Appeal against acquittal was not available to prove to any witness that the accused was responsible for the murder. The last time Wajitkar conducted a trial based on all three evidence-based evidence, the court critically reviewed the prosecution's witnesses and discussed them and excluded them on the basis that the two witnesses were close relatives. There were interested witnesses and the third witness who appeared to the police six days after the incident was also a witness of interest because he was a tenant. His last uncle's evidence, the last seen evidence which was otherwise a very weak evidence, was not rightly denied by the trial court, therefore affirming the quality evidence coming from unforgivable sources. Was not made and the gun used at the scene was not reported. It was a dead man's licensed gun that he obtained from a bird hunting home and, secondly, never been sent to the Franzic Expert or Finger Bureau. Expert medical evidence was also of no importance after taking finger prints from a gun because a firearm with an injury to the deceased's head would not indicate that it was fired by the accused in the absence of another connecting element. The story of the motive was also very weak when doubts were raised against the accused in the FIR only, the trial court discussed the evidence of litigation and the trial court This is the proper and reliable reason online advocate from Punch lawyer