Find a Lawyer

SAFDAR ALI versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/34/109 Testimony of Evidence The accused did not reside in the village during the time of the incident No evidence was available at the trial that the investigating officer had confessed on the day before the incident or incident. The accused could not be established in the village where the alleged incident took place, so it cannot be assumed that the accused, who did not live in the location, knew about the deceased coming to that village or He expected to return to his hometown. Until the relevant time it is shown that the accused had seen the deceased while going to the village, it would be unsafe to assume that the suspects were present at the spot where they could have been killed on the way or ambushed. The location was either a saddle path or a path cut in place. On the eve of the incident, the sugarcane crop stood up while the other side's vineyards grew and there were also sesame trees in one dark night, it would have been easy for anyone to understand who the attacker was and who Shot in a paddy crop with a thread away from the rivers and silk trees, the complainant's testimony that he was accused of accompanying the deceased at the time was not at all in that regard. By attending to the circumstances of the case, it was confirmed that the case was not registered immediately after the incident, but the case was registered before the preliminary investigation, was not well established as to who was at the time of the incident. What kind of weapon was used or what the nature was. Police showed clear case of recruitment by police in retrieving large number of cartridges on occasion. law firms from Sambrial lawyer