Find a Lawyer

QAYYUM NAWAZ versus N.W.F.P. SMALL INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT BOARD, PESHAWAR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 S, 25 A&38 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application The period of service to be included in the regular service of fact finding through labor appellate tribunal interference by the High Court Is in the constitutional jurisdiction of. Scope employees were hired on contract basis and were discharged from holiday employment and mortgage payments after the extension of their employment, however, their services expired shortly after the termination of employment. Demanded the presence of employees who deserved it. Even being recognized as regular employees during the term of the contract was rejected by the Labor Court, but in the appeal, the Labor Appellate Tribunal found that the employees were regular employees of the Constitutional High Court, who, in the exercise of its constitutional scope, The Labor Appellate Decree Delays After considering all the evidence, the correctness of the tribunal was determined by the Labor Appellate Tribunal e-Parties questioning the fact that the employees were permanent duty laborers in the Establishment and based on a contractual agreement between the employees and the employer. The employees were denied their legal rights as the Labor Appellate Tribunal rightly believed that the agreement had been reached. In view of the mandatory provisions of section 4 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 among the parties in respect of employment, the fact of the Labor Appellate Tribunal, based on the proper assessment of the evidence on record. It wasn't like that. High Core to exercise your constitutional jurisdiction solicitors from Barkhan lawyer