GHAZI versus M. ABDUL KHALIQ
The Border Services Tribunals Act of 1974 was made on the recommendation of Article 4 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Arts 2A, 27, 38 and 212 Appointment Members, made by Provincial Assembly Appointments for Legislative Appointments. Appointment of a person as a Laboratory Attendant was challenged by another person (appellant) on the recommendation of an MPA at a school in BP Section 1, who, on the recommendation of his uncle, preferred the appointment to this post. Claimed to have donated the land for the construction of the said school (the other person's representative (appellant)) was accepted and appointed He was terminated and told that the other person (appellant) was appointed after the appointment to take advantage of the department's treatment of the appointee. According to the rules of the Constitution of Pakistan and the Law Service, he was given an oath to perform his duties. Provided a mechanism for providing transparent, fair and equitable opportunities to all on a just basis, quoting allotment of quotas as MNS / MP and the appointments made under it. Went and based on the MPA's recommendation, the appointment was illegal and the other person was also a laboratory attendant at the school. S against his appointment had no right to claim a service appointment to the post had been separated with the Directive on the basis of designated donor of land for the school tribunal's decision. Open competition on merit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Hyderabad lawyer